MISSION PORTFOLIO · AGENTIC ENTERPRISE SECURITY

AI security services for the new perimeter.

IMS helps enterprises discover, map, test, and govern agentic systems before delegated action becomes the largest unowned attack surface in the company.

Service portfolio

From unknown exposure to defensible control.

Each engagement produces executive-ready evidence plus technical remediation detail. Every offer maps directly to the seven-surface agent perimeter.

ARCHITECTURE DESIGN

Enterprise Agent Security Architecture

Design agent identity, context provenance, tool gates, runtime boundaries, logging, and egress controls before scale.

Design safely →
RED TEAM ADVERSARIAL

AI Red Teaming

Test prompt injection, tool abuse, sensitive-data leakage, unsafe autonomy, and context-to-action exploit chains.

Test agents →
MCP TOOL CONTROL

MCP and Tooling Security Audit

Assess model-context servers, plugin scopes, API tools, shell/browser access, and action gates for over-delegated authority.

Audit tooling →
GRC OPERATING MODEL

AI Governance, Risk & Compliance

Replace policy theater with operating controls aligned to NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, security ownership, and audit evidence.

Build governance →
EXECUTIVE BOARD ROOM

Board / Executive AI Risk Briefing

Translate agent risk into fiduciary language: decisions, funding, accountability, residual risk, and operating cadence.

Brief leadership →
Engagement method

Discover. Map. Test. Prioritize. Brief.

A security program for agents has to move from inventory to proof. IMS works in short, evidence-producing sprints.

01

Discover

Inventory AI systems, vendors, agents, RAG pipelines, MCP servers, tool scopes, owners, and business workflows.

02

Map

Place every workflow on the seven-surface model and identify where controls are missing, ambiguous, or unowned.

03

Test

Probe high-risk systems with adversarial scenarios: indirect prompt injection, tool abuse, data leakage, and identity misuse.

04

Prioritize

Separate existential risk from noise. Build the roadmap by blast radius, likelihood, regulatory exposure, and business criticality.

05

Brief

Deliver board-ready language, technical evidence, and the operating decisions leadership must make.

OUTCOME

Defensible control

You leave with a map, a control plan, and a language your CISO, CIO, CAIO, board, and engineering leaders can share.

Assessment deliverables

What leadership receives.

Every engagement is designed to create artifacts that survive the meeting: proof, priorities, owners, and decisions.

01AI estate inventory

Agents, copilots, vendors, RAG stores, MCP servers, tool scopes, and production workflows.

02Seven-surface risk heatmap

Instruction, identity, context, tool, runtime, output, and egress exposure by business workflow.

03Attack-path evidence

Prompt-injection chains, tool-abuse paths, leakage opportunities, and failed control assumptions.

04Control roadmap

Owner, priority, dependency, effort, and risk-reduction rationale for every remediation.

05Executive decision memo

Board-safe language for risk acceptance, funding, operating cadence, and residual risk.

When to call IMS

Trigger events that should start an assessment.

AI agents in productionAny workflow can read internal data and call a tool.
MCP adoptionTeams are connecting models to APIs, filesystems, browsers, or shell-like capabilities.
Board asks about AI riskLeadership needs a credible risk narrative and decision agenda.
Security exception pressureBusiness teams want rapid deployment before controls are defined.
Vendor AI rolloutEnterprise platforms are adding agents faster than procurement/security can assess them.
Regulatory scrutinyAI governance must become evidence, not policy theater.
Start here

Begin with the posture assessment.

If your enterprise has agents, copilots, MCP servers, or AI vendors in production, the first question is not which tool to buy. It is where the perimeter is.

Request assessmentReview the atlas